Genco Blog

Risk management in foreign trade: Why Incoterms are a multidisciplinary decision

In the global foreign trade landscape, Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) are the universal language that defines the responsibilities between buyer and seller. However, for companies operating in Brazil, choosing the "wrong" Incoterm is not just an operational mistake; it can quickly turn into a complex tax, customs, and compliance issue.

Many global corporations, accustomed to the fluidity of markets like Europe, the US, or Asia, attempt to replicate their Incoterm strategies in Brazil. It is at this point that the Brazilian regulatory and fiscal reality imposes itself, revealing a unique environment that demands a strategic and localized approach.

Why common Incoterms become problematic

While certain Incoterms work perfectly in other countries, the Brazilian environment presents specific characteristics that make them highly problematic. This is due to a combination of factors:

Import Tax Structure: The complexity of Brazilian taxes (II, IPI, PIS/COFINS, ICMS) and the need for tax credits make defining who pays the tax crucial.

Strict Customs Regulations: The requirements of the Federal Revenue Service (Receita Federal) and SISCOMEX (Integrated Foreign Trade System)—now with the consolidation of DUIMP (Single Import Declaration)—demand clarity regarding the legal importer of record.

Tax and Legal Liability: Brazilian legislation is clear regarding the liability of the importer, who must have a legal presence in the country.

Tax Impacts on Freight and Insurance: International freight and insurance costs make up the calculation basis for several taxes, directly influencing the final cost of the goods.

Operational Control Limitations: A lack of control over critical stages can lead to delays and additional costs.

Sensitive Incoterms in Brazil: DDP and EXW

DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) – Extremely sensitive

The DDP Incoterm, where the seller assumes all costs and risks until delivery at the destination place—including the payment of import taxes and fees—is unfeasible for formal imports into Brazil.

Legal unfeasibility: A foreign supplier, without a local branch or corporate taxpayer ID (CNPJ), cannot legally act as the official importer of record in Brazil. Legislation requires the importer to be an entity established in the country for customs and tax registration purposes.

Tax and compliance Issue: The Brazilian importer needs to pay the import taxes in order to claim tax credits. If the foreign exporter pays these taxes, the Brazilian importer loses the right to the tax credit, which can make the operation economically unfeasible and, worse, be considered irregular by the Federal Revenue Service. Tax payments made by foreign third parties are not accepted in the Brazilian customs system.

EXW (Ex Works) – Frequently problematic

Although very common globally, the EXW Incoterm, where the seller makes the goods available at their factory and the buyer assumes all costs and risks from there, is problematic for both Brazilian imports and exports.

In Brazilian exports: The Brazilian exporter is responsible for issuing the export invoice (Nota Fiscal) and registering the DU-E (Single Export Declaration). Under EXW, the foreign buyer would have to assume these responsibilities, which is unfeasible without a legal presence in Brazil. The recommendation is to replace EXW with FCA (Free Carrier), where the seller delivers the goods ready for export at an agreed location.

In Brazilian imports: The Brazilian importer assumes the risk right from the supplier's factory. Any problem in collecting the goods or obtaining export documents in the country of origin can stall the entire operation, generating delays and unexpected costs.

More practical and controllable Incoterms in Brazil: FCA, FOB, and CIF

Incoterms like FCA, FOB (Free On Board), and CIF (Cost, Insurance and Freight) tend to be much more practical and controllable for Brazilian importers and exporters. They allow customs responsibilities and tax visibility to be clearly defined.

FCA and FOB: These offer greater logistical control to the Brazilian importer, allowing for the choice of freight forwarder and direct freight negotiation. Under FCA, the seller delivers the goods to the carrier nominated by the buyer at an agreed location. Under FOB, delivery occurs on board the vessel at the port of shipment.

CIF and CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To): International freight and insurance are paid by the exporter, but customs clearance risk and tax liability in Brazil rest with the importer. It is crucial to remember that the international freight value forms part of the calculation basis for Brazilian taxes (Customs Value), directly impacting the final cost.

Incoterms: A strategic multidisciplinary decision

In Brazil, Incoterms are not just logistical definitions. They directly impact:

Tax exposure: Who pays what and how this affects tax credits.

Customs liability: Clarity on who the legal importer is and their obligations.

Cost visibility: Transparency regarding all components of the total import cost.

Foreign exchange (FX) impact: The way freight and insurance are paid can influence exposure to exchange rate volatility.

Insurance liability: Clear definition of who is responsible for cargo insurance at each leg of the journey.

Compliance risks: Alignment with Brazilian customs and tax regulations.

Cash flow: The timing of cost and tax payments.

Operational control: The ability to manage and monitor the logistical process.

It is concerning that many negotiations are still conducted solely based on a comparison of freight costs, ignoring the deep implications of Incoterms. The most successful companies operating in Brazil treat the choice of Incoterms as a strategic decision involving multiple departments: Procurement, Logistics, Tax, Finance, Customs, and Legal. This multidisciplinary approach is the key to ensuring safe, efficient operations that comply with the complex Brazilian reality.

The impact of the 2026 tax reform

With the transition to the Dual VAT system (CBS and IBS) starting in 2026, the choice of Incoterms becomes even more critical. The Tax Reform aims for non-cumulativeness, and for the importer to be able to claim credits from the new taxes, it is fundamental that they are the legal payer. This reinforces the unfeasibility of Incoterms like DDP and underscores the need to review international contracts to ensure compliance with the new fiscal regime.

Conclusion

Navigating Brazilian foreign trade requires more than knowledge of global rules; it requires a deep understanding of local nuances. The strategic choice of Incoterms is a fundamental pillar for the safety, efficiency, and profitability of import and export operations in Brazil. To ignore this reality is to expose the company to unnecessary risks and significant financial losses.


Avoid mistakes when importing!

Having a specialized import consultancy can save you from many future risks. See what Genco Import & Export can do for you:

  • Sourcing your product to find the best value for your product.
  • Simulating all costs before you embark on this journey.
  • Negotiating values with suppliers, freight forwarders, and customs brokers.
  • Unifying all documents. Less headache for you!
  • Closing the exchange rate for your process.
  • Conducting inspections and issuing complete reports for your follow-up.

And much more!

Count on Genco for the best advisory for your imports.

Contact us and learn more about our services!

Share
this article

NETHERLANDS

EUA

CHINA

BRAZIL